Posts
On our last trip back to Indiana--May of '08--I bought a portable scanner and scanned in a boatload of family photos. Many were from my maternal grandmother's shoebox, and many more were held by my aunt and my sister. Somehow I never ended up with any family pictures... :(
So over the summer I've been going through the scans. Given that I had very limited time to do the scans originally, I usually scanned four or five pictures at a time, then flipped them over and scanned the writing on the backs. Now I'm separating out each image, and combining front and back side-by-side in the same image. It's not a complicated process, but it's very time-consuming. It's also something that desperately needs to be done, so I can go about finding out who some of these people are. When all of the pictures are separated out, I'm going to caption those that don't already have identifying notes. I'm also going to put together a filename system and spreadsheet-based database of all of my picture files that will include the names of the people and places in the photo (Shayna has already started this on her family photos). I've got a tentative filename structure planned out, but I haven't begun to implement it yet. When I get ready to do so, I'll post it here if anyone wants to give feedback on it.
I would like to get prints of some of these photos, but many are so grainy, dirty, or damaged that they wouldn't look very nice. Anyone know a good place to get photos touched up relatively inexpensively?
03 August 2009
08 June 2009
Addendum to "Software Reviews": The Master Genealogist
On May 25, I posted an entry about my search for a new genealogy program. A few people have since asked me why I didn't look at The Master Genealogist, considered by many to be the best in the field. There are really two main reasons for this. First, TMG Gold is $59 if you download it (which would be my preferred method), twice the cost of RootsMagic 4 ($29.95), my eventual choice (which I also downloaded). Second, every review and every person I spoke to said that TMG is a powerful program, but that it has a pretty steep learning curve. At this point, I don't want to spend a lot of time learning a new program. I have very little free time to work on the family history anyway, and I'd rather spend that actually doing family history and not trying to figure out the software. All of TMG's power would be wasted on me, since I wouldn't be able to commit the time necessary to learn how to effectively use it.
TMG has a 30-day trial package, and it's entirely possible that at some point I might give it a try. Right now, though, it just doesn't seem like a good fit for me.
TMG has a 30-day trial package, and it's entirely possible that at some point I might give it a try. Right now, though, it just doesn't seem like a good fit for me.
30 May 2009
Organization is not one of my strong skills
In the few minutes of free time that I can scrounge here and there, I've been trying to do some much-needed organization of my files. For the most part, it's just a slow process, but something happened today that could be a major setback.
A bit of background--when I go to the local Family History center to look at microfilm, I take my digital camera and a tripod along. That way, instead of having to copy down lots of information by hand or frequently dismounting the reels to take them to the printer (and having to pay for the copies), I can just snap a digital image. It speeds up the research process greatly, and means I'm spending considerably less time at the FHC. Plus, I end up with a digital copy that's far clearer than a photocopy. When I would take a picture, I'd write down the roll, page number--all the necessary source info.
Well, today I was going to organize some of these photos--and I can't find the source information pages. My fear is that I thought they were notes on places to look--notes that I was done with--and that I threw them out. I'm really hoping I wasn't that stupid.
I still have a lot of paper files to go through--maybe I'll get lucky and they'll be in there somewhere. Otherwise, I have a lot of microfilm I'm going to have to go through all over again.
A bit of background--when I go to the local Family History center to look at microfilm, I take my digital camera and a tripod along. That way, instead of having to copy down lots of information by hand or frequently dismounting the reels to take them to the printer (and having to pay for the copies), I can just snap a digital image. It speeds up the research process greatly, and means I'm spending considerably less time at the FHC. Plus, I end up with a digital copy that's far clearer than a photocopy. When I would take a picture, I'd write down the roll, page number--all the necessary source info.
Well, today I was going to organize some of these photos--and I can't find the source information pages. My fear is that I thought they were notes on places to look--notes that I was done with--and that I threw them out. I'm really hoping I wasn't that stupid.
I still have a lot of paper files to go through--maybe I'll get lucky and they'll be in there somewhere. Otherwise, I have a lot of microfilm I'm going to have to go through all over again.
25 May 2009
Time for a change; Software reviews
I've decided that it's time to switch genealogy software. Since I started, I've been using PAF (now on version 5.2). PAF was the perfect beginner's software--free, easy to use, and powerful. But PAF isn't being updated anymore, and frankly, it's lacking a lot of features that most other programs have, and some of the newer programs make some tasks (like managing sources) easier.
I found an article on Diane Haddad's Genealogy Insider blog (a part of Family Tree Magazine) that gave the results of FamilySearch's genealogy software awards (original article here). I thought this would be a good place to start, so I downloaded the trial versions of Ancestral Quest 12.1 and RootsMagic 4. I borrowed a copy of Family Tree Maker 2008 for evaluation purposes. I looked briefly at a few other packages (Family Tree Magazine has a useful software guide, with price and reviews), but none really impressed me enough to even warrant a test drive.
So the choice came down to Ancestral Quest, Roots Magic, and Family Tree Maker. I started with Family Tree Maker, expecting to be wowed by it's comprehensive feature list. And yes, it does a lot. But the interface is very busy--there's a lot of information on the main screen, which can be good, but it also looks cluttered, and it's not always easy to read on a laptop. I also didn't care for many of the dialog boxes, like the source entry box. It just wasn't particularly intuitive. The big draw for FTM was its integration with Ancestry.com, and some versions of the program come with subscriptions to Ancestry included. This could be very helpful, especially for beginners who haven't used Ancestry before, and who would be bringing a lot of info from there into the program. I've already done most of that, so Ancestry isn't as useful to me now as it used to be. Most of the time when I use Ancestry now I'm doing so on the computers at the Family History Center, so I wouldn't be using that feature anyway. So FTM wasn't crossed off immediately, but it didn't really impress me, either.
I tried RootsMagic next. After a few minutes, I really started to like this program. It's not as big as FTM, and it doesn't write itself into the registry like most packages, either (that's a good thing). It also means that it can be run from a flash drive, so you could go to the library to do your research and take just a flash drive and leave your laptop at home. There are a lot of reasons why someone might not want to do this (security, viruses, etc), but it's a neat feature. Anyway, the program begins with a godawful Tahoma font that's very ugly. Luckily, that's easy to change, and once I did, the program looked 100% better. Why the people at RootsMagic didn't set Arial or Times as the default font, I'll never know. The program has a much more streamlined interface than FTM, but it shows mostly the same information. It has most of the same features as FTM, including a mapping feature (that requires a 68MB download, but it's worth it--this might come on the CD should you choose that method of purchase), and it just feels smoother, easier, and more straightforward than FTM does. What really impressed me was how easy RootsMagic makes entering sources. When you choose a source type, you get a dialog window that tells you exactly what information to enter:
I have a bad habit of not entering source data when I first find a piece of information, largely because it was kind of a pain-in-the-rear with PAF. Consequently, I have a lot of source information that still needs to be entered into my file. With a program that makes it this easy, I might even get around to doing that!
So RootsMagic really impressed me. The only downside I can see is that, if I decide to change packages again in the future, most other programs don't import directly from RootsMagic's file type. I can still export as a GEDCOM, but not in any other format. This shouldn't be a problem, but it's a feature that really should be there.
Finally, I tried Ancestral Quest. This program is pretty easy to describe if you've ever used PAF--Ancestral Quest looks and works a lot like PAF, so much so that it almost looks like a new version of that program. It took only a few minutes for me to conclude that it's simply not different enough and doesn't have many of the nice features that I liked about FTM and RM. If I'm going to go through the trouble of switching, I want to switch to a package that is going to be a lot better than what I have, not just (essentially) an incremental update.
So the choice really came down to Family Tree Maker and RootsMagic, and RootsMagic's ease of use, more elegant appearance (once that hideous Tahoma font was banished), and the killer source function made it a clear winner for me. Now I just have to upgrade from the trial version, and uninstall the others. But first...lunch!
I found an article on Diane Haddad's Genealogy Insider blog (a part of Family Tree Magazine) that gave the results of FamilySearch's genealogy software awards (original article here). I thought this would be a good place to start, so I downloaded the trial versions of Ancestral Quest 12.1 and RootsMagic 4. I borrowed a copy of Family Tree Maker 2008 for evaluation purposes. I looked briefly at a few other packages (Family Tree Magazine has a useful software guide, with price and reviews), but none really impressed me enough to even warrant a test drive.
So the choice came down to Ancestral Quest, Roots Magic, and Family Tree Maker. I started with Family Tree Maker, expecting to be wowed by it's comprehensive feature list. And yes, it does a lot. But the interface is very busy--there's a lot of information on the main screen, which can be good, but it also looks cluttered, and it's not always easy to read on a laptop. I also didn't care for many of the dialog boxes, like the source entry box. It just wasn't particularly intuitive. The big draw for FTM was its integration with Ancestry.com, and some versions of the program come with subscriptions to Ancestry included. This could be very helpful, especially for beginners who haven't used Ancestry before, and who would be bringing a lot of info from there into the program. I've already done most of that, so Ancestry isn't as useful to me now as it used to be. Most of the time when I use Ancestry now I'm doing so on the computers at the Family History Center, so I wouldn't be using that feature anyway. So FTM wasn't crossed off immediately, but it didn't really impress me, either.
I tried RootsMagic next. After a few minutes, I really started to like this program. It's not as big as FTM, and it doesn't write itself into the registry like most packages, either (that's a good thing). It also means that it can be run from a flash drive, so you could go to the library to do your research and take just a flash drive and leave your laptop at home. There are a lot of reasons why someone might not want to do this (security, viruses, etc), but it's a neat feature. Anyway, the program begins with a godawful Tahoma font that's very ugly. Luckily, that's easy to change, and once I did, the program looked 100% better. Why the people at RootsMagic didn't set Arial or Times as the default font, I'll never know. The program has a much more streamlined interface than FTM, but it shows mostly the same information. It has most of the same features as FTM, including a mapping feature (that requires a 68MB download, but it's worth it--this might come on the CD should you choose that method of purchase), and it just feels smoother, easier, and more straightforward than FTM does. What really impressed me was how easy RootsMagic makes entering sources. When you choose a source type, you get a dialog window that tells you exactly what information to enter:
I have a bad habit of not entering source data when I first find a piece of information, largely because it was kind of a pain-in-the-rear with PAF. Consequently, I have a lot of source information that still needs to be entered into my file. With a program that makes it this easy, I might even get around to doing that!
So RootsMagic really impressed me. The only downside I can see is that, if I decide to change packages again in the future, most other programs don't import directly from RootsMagic's file type. I can still export as a GEDCOM, but not in any other format. This shouldn't be a problem, but it's a feature that really should be there.
Finally, I tried Ancestral Quest. This program is pretty easy to describe if you've ever used PAF--Ancestral Quest looks and works a lot like PAF, so much so that it almost looks like a new version of that program. It took only a few minutes for me to conclude that it's simply not different enough and doesn't have many of the nice features that I liked about FTM and RM. If I'm going to go through the trouble of switching, I want to switch to a package that is going to be a lot better than what I have, not just (essentially) an incremental update.
So the choice really came down to Family Tree Maker and RootsMagic, and RootsMagic's ease of use, more elegant appearance (once that hideous Tahoma font was banished), and the killer source function made it a clear winner for me. Now I just have to upgrade from the trial version, and uninstall the others. But first...lunch!
23 May 2009
Blood is thicker than geography
I haven't been working on the family history much--just too much else to do. But I recently discovered a couple of stores on eBay that sell CDs with copies of old books and documents. I bought a couple, and they're really useful. While looking through one, I discovered something interesting--I've known for quite a while now that I'm descended from Jost Hite, a well-known Virginia pioneer. The line of descent goes:
Jost Hite > Colonel John Hite > John Hite, Jr. > Francis Asbury Hite > Mary Jane Hite + Peter Adam
Mary Jane Hite and Peter Adam are my 3rd great-grandparents. What I just discovered, though, is that Jacob Hite, brother of Francis Asbury, is my 4th Great-grand uncle (by marriage). Peter Adam's mother was Elizabeth Scales, whose sister married Jacob Hite.
I find it impossible to believe that Peter moved from Cabell County, WV to Madison, Indiana, and just happened to find there the niece of his uncle by marriage. There must have been some kind of communication between the families, but I don't want to go so far as to suggest that it was an arranged marriage. It's just very interesting how families kept so close while spreading out over the growing country.
Jost Hite > Colonel John Hite > John Hite, Jr. > Francis Asbury Hite > Mary Jane Hite + Peter Adam
Mary Jane Hite and Peter Adam are my 3rd great-grandparents. What I just discovered, though, is that Jacob Hite, brother of Francis Asbury, is my 4th Great-grand uncle (by marriage). Peter Adam's mother was Elizabeth Scales, whose sister married Jacob Hite.
I find it impossible to believe that Peter moved from Cabell County, WV to Madison, Indiana, and just happened to find there the niece of his uncle by marriage. There must have been some kind of communication between the families, but I don't want to go so far as to suggest that it was an arranged marriage. It's just very interesting how families kept so close while spreading out over the growing country.
19 December 2008
A few changes
I haven't had time to do much on the family history since we returned from our Indiana trip in the spring--I've just been too busy with the baby (Lizzie just turned 1! Happy Birthday, Princess!) and with the dissertation (which is finally coming along). But Shayna wanted a couple of changes to the website for security reasons, so I thought I should mention them here.
On the "Links" page, there are now links to ancestry charts for both Shayna and myself. Both of these are also now password-protected. If you're interested in looking at them, send us an email and we'll send you an access code. Basically, with the rise of identity theft and a concern for privacy, we wanted to make the charts available to family, but keep that personal information from being easily accessible to people trolling for personal data. For the same reason, we may occasionally change the access codes. If your code stops working, that's probably why. Email us and we'll be happy to send you the updated code. Sorry to add the extra hassle, but such is the world we live in...unfortunately.
The other changes are to the blog. If you look on the left side of the screen, you'll see a new feature titled "Get new posts sent directly to your email account." Just enter your email address in the box, and whenever we make a new post, it'll be emailed directly to you. It's a great way to keep up with us, especially since we don't post often. I also added a link on the left side to the main page of our website.
On the "Links" page, there are now links to ancestry charts for both Shayna and myself. Both of these are also now password-protected. If you're interested in looking at them, send us an email and we'll send you an access code. Basically, with the rise of identity theft and a concern for privacy, we wanted to make the charts available to family, but keep that personal information from being easily accessible to people trolling for personal data. For the same reason, we may occasionally change the access codes. If your code stops working, that's probably why. Email us and we'll be happy to send you the updated code. Sorry to add the extra hassle, but such is the world we live in...unfortunately.
The other changes are to the blog. If you look on the left side of the screen, you'll see a new feature titled "Get new posts sent directly to your email account." Just enter your email address in the box, and whenever we make a new post, it'll be emailed directly to you. It's a great way to keep up with us, especially since we don't post often. I also added a link on the left side to the main page of our website.
30 May 2008
In the beginning
Well, I decided that in addition to our family history website, it might be interesting to keep a blog covering not only what we've learned, but the research we've done, where we've been, and who we've met along the way. I have no idea how often we'll post here, especially since we don't have much time for research right now, so please be patient with us.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)